Looking Forward to the Next 25 Years – Part 3

Part 3:
Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program

In looking forward to the next 25 years, the Making Math Real Institute (MMRI), in addition to continuing its focus on providing and expanding the 700 hours of seminars currently available, will present a new focus on providing significant support in helping MMR practitioners maximize their development as clinical math educators. I will be offering the following new structures to implement this new focus on the clinical development of MMR practitioners and all will be presented in a distance-learning format:

THE LAB SCHOOL MENTORSHIP PROGRAM (LSMP)
Distance-Learning Format

The Lab School Mentorship Program (LSMP) provides the highest level and most intensive and comprehensive experience in helping MMR practitioners become complete clinical math educators. The possibility of receiving certification from David Berg and the Making Math Real Institute can be an additional outcome of the MMR practitioner’s successful mentorship experience. The LSMP is intended for highly experienced MMR practitioners and/or classroom teachers who have completed most or all of the MMR series of 12 courses, and most importantly, have been successfully practicing and applying MMR-based interventions at various levels and with students with diverse processing styles for two or more years.

The Genesis of the LSMP

Since going public with Making Math Real 25 years ago, I have frequently expressed my wish for having a “lab school” format in which participants could receive guidance and supervision while practicing the MMR methods directly with students, because it is not until an MMR practitioner begins working directly with students that the developmentally targeted simultaneous multisensory structures are activated, which is why, when people say: “Making Math Real – it works!” what they really mean is when students experience amazing successful transformations while learning through MMR, “it” means youthe teacher, have delivered the MMR methods correctly – it’s not the methods in isolation, it is how the methods have been delivered that makes all the difference.

All MMR Practitioners Need and Deserve Mentorship to Help Them Become Outstanding Clinical Practitioners

Over the years I have seen some course participants become successful MMR practitioners without the benefit of ongoing mentorship, guidance, and supervision. This is a most impressive achievement on their part and they deserve all the credit for their constancy of vision, hard work, and determination. Even though so many have done so well on their own, all would have received significant added benefit from mentorship to:

All MMR practitioners need and deserve this ongoing support to help them become outstanding clinical practitioners.

Win – Win – Win

Since I have not been able to provide an actual lab school for MMR practitioners who come from around the world, the solution is to have each practitioner create their own lab school by having one (or more) of their students provide the lab school experience. The Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program turns the practitioners’ experience of providing an MMR-based intervention into a full scale clinical practice mentored by me. I will provide comprehensive support in all aspects of the clinical intervention including initial assessment, prescriptive scopes and sequences, where to begin instruction, correct methods applications, interpretation and diagnostics of students’ processing behaviors, additional and more intensive methods not included in the courses when indicated, communication with parents and teachers, writing IEP goals and objectives, advocating for students’ needs, etc.

The Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program is intended to provide a win – win – win structure in which the student will be receiving the benefit of my direct involvement in all aspects of the individual remediation, the practitioner will be receiving maximum support in deepening their understanding and application practice of becoming a clinical practitioner of MMR, and the parents will know their child/children are receiving the maximum benefit possible.

How the LSMP Program Works

I have already been providing the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program as a field trial for a number of students and their mentees for almost two years, and it has been extremely successful for students, their practitioners, and parents. The entire structure and delivery of the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program has been done exclusively via distance-learning, which means that practitioners and students can receive these services from anywhere in the world where the internet is available.


Who Pays For the LSMP?

The intended structure of the LSMP is students’ parents pay for my services. This means that if parents would like my direct involvement in their child’s/children’s ongoing intervention services, the parents cover the costs of my services as well as the costs of the MMR practitioner.

My services will be paid for in the form of a retainer that minimally covers six hours of my time and requires replenishing the retainer once it reaches one third (or less) of the minimum-level retainer amount. Upon termination of my services, all remaining balances in the retainer will be refunded. Click here for billing and payment details.


How Does a Parent or MMR Practitioner Request a Possible Mentorship Arrangement?

Prior to sending in a request for the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program to [email protected], both the practitioner and the parents need to agree that they want this service. Please note that all requests require that both parents and the practitioner(s) are already in agreement about participating in the Mentorship Program. Requests submitted from either just a practitioner or just parents will not be considered, and we will inform the sender to re-apply once parents and practitioner are in agreement to move forward.

Upon receiving a formal request, the MMRI will respond as soon as possible to inform if there is an available slot for a new mentorship arrangement, and if there is no current availability, senders can either request placement on a waiting list or check back in at a later date(s) for current status; and if there is availability, we will initiate the process of getting started. First, I will determine if the student and the MMR practitioner are appropriate for the Mentorship Program (please see below for details). If both student and practitioner meet the guidelines for moving forward, we will send a Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program agreement contract to the parents, and once it is signed and a first retainer payment is received, we will schedule a time for the initial observation session as described above in which I will need assessment reports from both the practitioner and parents as much in advance of the initial observation session as possible.


What Kinds of Cases are Indicated for the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program?

There are two considerations for appropriate mentorship cases. The first is the student and the second is the practitioner. The intended student case is for challenging issues, which include diagnosed math learning disabilities including dyscalculia and/or other developmental issues that have contributed to significant underdevelopment in self-regulatory executive functions, activating and sustaining working memory, sequencing, number sense, and reasoning; and conditions affecting visual, auditory, and kinesthetic/motor processing, and processing styles that have previously not responded well to intervention(s). Cases involving certain neurological issues such as brain damage, brain tissue malformation, lesions, and medical/genetic conditions/syndromes that could have neuro-cognitive impact such as Prader-Willi Syndrome, Down’s Syndrome, PANS/PANDAS, Tourette’s Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome, etc., will need to be evaluated on an individual case-by-case basis to determine if a developmental intervention is indicated.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Commensurate with students who are appropriate for the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program, all students will need an independent study in math to receive full benefit from their individual prescriptions. Therefore, the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program is not applicable to students who are still in their regular math classes at school.

Students with less intensive challenges and students “who just need better teaching” (this is by far the most common referral I receive. These are students with no processing development issues, rather, their experience in school has created false indications of a learning disability or significant challenge(s) that quickly begin to disappear with the provision of appropriate curriculum delivery) are not intended for the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program, but would be appropriate for the Making Math Real Supervision Program*.

Stay tuned for future blog posts highlighting the new Supervision Program!


Which MMR Practitioners can apply for LSMP?

The appropriate practitioner is as critical to the success of the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program as the appropriate student. The Mentorship Program experience for the practitioner is rigorous and intensive, but also extremely rewarding. The MMR practitioner must be advanced, having completed all or most of the 12 MMR series of courses and having a minimum of two years experience in applying the MMR methods to students at various levels of development and diverse processing styles.

For the Mentorship Program to function appropriately, the MMR practitioner must have a sufficient degree of clinical observational ability, because they will serve as “my clinical eyes”, meaning I need to rely on their accuracy of observations. The practitioner’s accurate clinical observations of the student’s affective and cognitive behaviors is necessary, otherwise, I would need to continue observing the student working with the practitioner to gather the clinical data I need to provide detailed diagnostics, interpretations, and recommendations for prescriptive teaching methods and content.

Furthermore, the practitioner must be “coachable”, meaning that everything they do will be under my scrutiny, and must therefore be able to respond to my comments and observations with a professional detachment that does not misinterpret any of my comments and observations as a personal judgment of who they are as individuals or the quality of their skills as a practitioner. Everything I express will always be clinically neutral and objective and must be received with the same clinical neutrality and objectivity.

Not everyone is intended for this kind of experience, and every prospective MMR practitioner must first determine if this experience is personally feasible and can be maintained at an appropriate level of clinical objectivity, integrity, professionalism, and commitment.

The Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program can also be applied for classroom teachers and it is intended that the school/district would cover the costs. The overall structure for the classroom model is similar to the individual student model described above. Click here for classroom model details.

The character traits necessary for the coachable MMR practitioner include being:

  • proactive,
  • motivated,
  • expansive,
  • open-minded,
  • flexible,
  • committed,
  • clinical,
  • professional,
  • stable,
  • observant (to detail),
  • able to generate clinically significant observation notes.

Will There Be Certification for MMR Practitioners?

Yes, the possibility of certification can be the result of a practitioner’s successful long-term experience in the Making Math Real Lab School Mentorship Program.

Since the purpose of the Mentorship Program is the development of a clinically applied education practice, as I observe the practitioner’s consistent ability to establish and maintain clinically prescriptive interventions for three or more students with different processing styles and at various levels of math development over a period of at least one year for each, I will, on my discretion, grant certification in the practice of Making Math Real to that practitioner.

Certification will be entirely based on the practitioner’s work in the field, therefore, certification will not be based on exams, orals, boards, etc. Once I am convinced of the practitioner’s comprehensive clinical practice, certification will be granted.

Certification will indicate that the clinical educator is independently able to:

  • Provide initial assessment to determine students’ processing indications, development, and current skills levels, which may also include the ability to accurately interpret data from a variety of additional sources: psychometric testing, IEPs, reports from teachers, parents, and reports from allied professionals: occupational therapists, speech and language pathologists, educational therapists, medical professionals, etc.
  • Create individually prescriptive scopes and sequences based on initial assessment and provide comprehensive instruction as the sole provider of students’ (independent study) math programs
  • Deliver MMR methods correctly in alignment with students’ processing indications
  • Correctly interpret and diagnose student’s ongoing affective and cognitive behaviors and appropriately adapt all curriculum delivery to be in alignment with clinical interpretations and diagnoses
  • Continue to deepen and refine students’ individual prescriptions
  • Establish effective rapport with students and employ effective management structures
  • Maintain effective and comprehensive clinical observation notes
  • Sustain effective communication with parents, schools, teachers, allied professionals, etc.
  • Maintain comprehensive documentation of all forms of students’ progress and development including work samples, assessments, reports, etc., and, as needed, provide reports to parents, IEP teams, allied professionals, etc.
  • Write prescriptive students’ goals and objectives for parents or IEPs
  • Independently and appropriately adapt and refine instructional practices that have not been included in the MMR courses

Making Math Real Certification will include:

  • All certified MMR practitioners will receive a certification document from the MMRI, and will be listed on the Making Math Real website.
  • On the MMR website, all certified MMR practitioners are welcome to include any personal statements about the services they provide and any contact information for prospective clients.
  • Although it has been a strict policy of the MMRI that we do not make referrals, ALL certified practitioners will be the only practitioners to receive referrals, both from the website as well as in verbal and written communications from the institute and from me.

Please Stay Tuned for More Upcoming Full Descriptions of the New Making Math Real Institute
Services for Clinical Development.

Next Up: The Making Math Real Supervision Program

Please stay tuned for the next full description of the new Making Math Real Institute Supervision Program: the broadest scope and most accessible of the Institute’s programs for helping MMR practitioners become complete clinical math educators.

Be well and stay healthy.

David Berg, E.T.
Founder & Director of the Making Math Real Institute
Creator of the Making Math Real Simultaneous Multisensory Structured Methods